॥ प्रत्यभिज्ञा ॥

Karuppacami Kelvittaal

A Philosophical Questionnaire கருப்பசாமி கேள்விதாள்

"Any word arising out of his mouth is the extraordinary mantra; any standing of his body is precisely mudrā..."
— Abhinavagupta, Anubhavavinivedana

From the Masters

𑆖𑆴𑆠𑆴𑆂 𑆱𑇀𑆮𑆠𑆤𑇀𑆠𑇀𑆫𑆳 𑆮𑆴𑆯𑇀𑆮𑆱𑆴𑆢𑇀𑆣𑆴𑆲𑆼𑆠𑆶𑆂

citiḥ svatantrā viśvasiddhihetuḥ

"Free thought is the means to perfect everything in the world."

— Pratyabhijñāhṛdayam, Sūtra 1

𑆱𑇀𑆮𑆼𑆖𑇀𑆗𑆪𑆳 𑆱𑇀𑆮𑆯𑆑𑇀𑆠𑆴𑆥𑇀𑆫𑆑𑆳𑆯𑆤𑆼

svecchayā svaśaktiprakāśane

"By its own will, it manifests its own power."

— Tantrāloka

𑆥𑇀𑆫𑆠𑇀𑆪𑆨𑆴𑆘𑇀𑆚𑆳 𑆲𑆸𑆢𑆪𑆩𑇀

pratyabhijñā hṛdayam

"Recognition is the heart."

— Kṣemarāja

The Proust Questionnaire, born in late 18th/19th-century European salons, wills its metempsychosis here at aformulationoftruth.com for the edification and enlightenment of a culture in dire straits. We may regard each question as a threshold (dvāra), each answer a seed for recognition (pratyabhijñā). Respond, then forget the questions and how you answered. Let time work its alchemy. And when you return to them, a former self awaits. Your self no longer because, like a stranger, some of those responses you could not fathom. And in rereading them, you recognize an aspect of our nature. Language is the means we have to suggest one Self toward a more perfected treatment of one another.

Each question opens a threshold; each answer plants a seed for recognition. Respond, then forget. Only to return to encounter a stranger who speaks in your name—words now opaque, with certainties foreign. This is not failure but structure: the subject is more often elsewhere, barred from itself by the language through which a cultural evolution speaks.

What we call 'self-knowledge' is retroactive, a fiction we construct in the return1. Yet something—desire, ego—transmits along though the nonce. Language—insufficient though it seems with its slips of the tongue that betray truer depths—remains the only means we have to incline one speaking being toward another. Not to perfect understanding, for there exists nothing to perfect, but to the recognition that we are all, equally, subjects of this same habit speech.

  1. Literal return — Coming back to the questionnaire years later, re-reading your old answers.
    Retroaction (Nachträglichkeit) — Meaning is always constructed backwards. You don't know what you meant until later. The trauma, the truth, the significance arrives après-coup—after the fact. Your past answers only become meaningful when you return to interpret them.
    The return of the repressed — What you couldn't say, what slipped out, what you avoided—it comes back. Your old answers reveal not what you consciously meant but what was speaking through you.
    The eternal return of the signifier — We're caught in circuits of repetition. You return to the same questions, thinking you've changed, only to find the same structures, the same patterns, the same impossible desire inscribed differently.

35 Questions

Inquiries spanning virtue, fault, dreams, and desires

Privacy-First Auto-Save

Your reflections preserved as you write, secured with AES-256 encryption. No one can ever again view what is recorded at A Formulation of Truth, unless you so choose.

PDF Export

Generate a document & behold the capaciousness of consciousness

Available In

English · संस्कृतम् · தமிழ் · हिन्दी · ಕನ್ನಡ · Español

Begin Your Inquiry

Enter through the Bhairava Gateway